I have some things on my mind about saving some desirables of the past. Diversity is valuable, it acknowledges our difference and helps us to see the use of our contributing. The First Amendment is so lovely in helping our possibility to make friends (questioning Deuteronomy 13 6-11, respecting the right to religion as we care for the rights of others to worship, and speak, as they see fit) and tell who we really are.
A list to consider.
WS Syndrome has been healing and is doing well healing their childhood. Maybe we all should do.
Which came first, religion or politics? Religion is a creativity and may be determined by self, politics too. Freedom to worship as desired. Encouragement to vote and participate. I wonder if it is political, seeking a decision to move in a direction and involvement of even self to self. Still, religion, worshiping what gave me the shelter to create myself is a power made/maker.
The lived life as primary study, evidence and creation of p.o.v. and personal philosophy.
What if behaviour and traits were thought of more as religious preference or expression... maybe environment worshipper., if a god/dess is sought, look in self, or Nature's God.
The government is not chosen to be for it or against religion, rather to enable peaceful freedom of expression.
For the environment: physical, and ethereal (memeish), fairness of law, agency and ability.
How our community comports itself, each individual, is maybe a matter of religious nuance.
What if (all?) diversity issues were religious choices of a citizen?
Self-identity, and to be cis-gen'd you have to make yourself known. Let's train ourselves to be authentic by commandeering our own voice and opinion.
Lineage, sameness, and differences we all relate to eachother as at once self, family, alike and irrepressibly unique. Comparisons seem to never serve well, except when hiding in the crowd.
The right of the people peaceably to ensemble: gender means style, sex means man & woman.
- Of students to wear black armbands to school to protest a war (“Students do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.”).
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
...maybe all wear. But never secret to parents, the same reason for the Federal Board of Education: a unified family, or a nation's style to inform and be informed. Trying not to alienate eachother because of our separate, but equitable, weirdness (sic, nn SMG).
See natal names July 10, 2016, commandeer your own voice March 1, 2012, love note & ws syndrom January 3, 2011
This is a few moments of redress.
No comments:
Post a Comment